Ginni Thomas told January 6 committee election was stolen, chairman


Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, the spouse of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, reiterated her perception that the 2020 election was stolen throughout her interview Thursday with the committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol, in accordance with committee Chairman Bennie G. Thompson (D-Miss.).

Her false assertion, practically two years after President Biden’s victory, got here throughout a five-hour closed-door interview with the committee.

The Attack: Before, during and after

Thomas, a conservative activist, drew the eye of the committee after investigators obtained emails between her and lawyer John Eastman, who had advocated a fringe authorized principle that Vice President Mike Pence may block the congressional certification of Biden’s electoral school win.

She additionally repeatedly pressed White House chief of workers Mark Meadows to search out methods to overturn the election, in accordance with messages she despatched to him weeks after the election. The messages characterize a rare pipeline between Thomas and one in every of Trump’s high aides because the president and his allies had been vowing to take their efforts all the best way to the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court, dogged by questions of legitimacy, is ready to resume

The committee says it could use clips from her look, if they’re warranted, in a future listening to. But lawmakers haven’t but scheduled their subsequent listening to.

Mark Paoletta, an lawyer for Thomas, stated in an announcement that she appeared earlier than the panel “to clear up the misconceptions about her actions surrounding the 2020 elections.”

“As she has stated from the outset, Mrs. Thomas had vital considerations about fraud and irregularities within the 2020 election,” the lawyer stated. “And, as she advised the Committee, her minimal and mainstream exercise targeted on guaranteeing that studies of fraud and irregularities had been investigated. Beyond that, she performed no function in any occasions after the 2020 election outcomes.”

The panel had beforehand contemplated issuing a subpoena to compel her testimony.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *